Test results
Advantages
Top image quality suitable for designers
Moderate power consumption
Integrated USB 3.0 hub
Flaws
No speakers
Visor only available as an option
Eizo ColorEdge CS2420 test results
- Price-quality ratio
Badly
- Value for money: 36
- Image quality (50%): 98.8
- Ergonomics (20%): 93.3
- Power consumption (10%): 74.8
- Equipment (20%): 55.9
Chip’s opinion: during the test, the Eizo ColorEdge CS2420 showed almost flawless image quality.
In particular, uniform illumination and over 99% coverage of the sRGB color space make this monitor a good choice for ambitious designers.
Eizo ColorEdge CS2420: alternative
Costing about the same, the BenQ SW2700PT delivers the same superb picture quality to satisfy designers.
At the same time, its resolution is higher, and the diagonal is larger. However, it also consumes more energy.
Eizo ColorEdge CS2420 specifications and test results
| Price-quality ratio |
|
| Diagonal size | |
| Aspect Ratio | |
| Permission | |
| Response Time (Grey — Grey) | |
| Maximum brightness | |
| Maximum Contrast | |
| sRGB color space coverage | |
| RGB color space coverage | |
| Checkerboard contrast | |
| Maximum viewing angle (50:1, vertical) | |
| Maximum viewing angle (50:1, horizontal) | |
| Frame rate (min/max) | |
| Matrix manufacturing technology | |
| HDMI | |
| display port | |
| Other video connectors | |
| Standby Power Consumption | |
| Power consumption during operation (white screen) | |
| Stand: height adjustment | |
| Stand: portrait mode | |
| Dimensions (WxHxD) | |
| The weight | |
| Power Supply |
