Test results
The Philips 328P6VJEB monitor proved to be mostly convincing during the tests and ended up with a good overall score. The device we tested performed remarkably well in the Image Quality scoring discipline, where our testers were particularly impressed. In addition, we liked that during the test this monitor did not reveal any serious flaws, and therefore, in each of the test categories, the score was not lower than average. At the time of testing, the price-performance ratio of the Philips 328P6VJEB was at a mediocre level.
Advantages
from 4K
pivot function
integrated stereo speakers
Flaws
mediocre viewing angle stability
Philips 328P6VJEB test results
- Price-quality ratio
Good - Place in the overall ranking
31 out of 65
- Value for money: 66
- Image quality (50%): 71.9
- Ergonomics (20%): 79
- Power consumption (10%): 75.1
- Equipment (20%): 69.8
Alternative: LG 34UB67-B
The LG 34UB67-B achieves much better test scores and is ranked 18th in our respective rankings with a remarkable 98 percent value for money (as of August 2017). A resolution of 2560×1080 pixels is enough for a 21:9 format panel, and the price of 43,000 rubles is much more attractive than the device from Philips.
Philips 328P6VJEB test results
Specifications and test results Philips 328P6VJEB
| Price-quality ratio |
|
| Diagonal size | |
| Aspect Ratio | |
| Permission | |
| Response Time (Grey — Grey) | |
| Maximum brightness | |
| Maximum Contrast | |
| sRGB color space coverage | |
| RGB color space coverage | |
| Checkerboard contrast | |
| Maximum viewing angle (50:1, vertical) | |
| Maximum viewing angle (50:1, horizontal) | |
| Frame rate (min/max) | |
| Matrix manufacturing technology | |
| HDMI | |
| display port | |
| Other video connectors | |
| Standby Power Consumption | |
| Power consumption during operation (white screen) | |
| Stand: height adjustment | |
| Stand: portrait mode | |
| Dimensions (WxHxD) | |
| The weight | |
| Power Supply |
